https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:14965 Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:54:46 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17374 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:01:32 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30901 0.7) with a feasible number of assessments. Adjusting scores against the expected supervision requirement considerably improved reliability, with G > 0.8 achieved with only nine assessments. Three per cent of trainees generated average mini-CEX scores below the expected standard. Conclusions: Using an entrustment scoring system, where supervisors score trainees on the level of supervision required, mini-CEX scores demonstrated moderate reliability within a feasible number of assessments, and evidence of validity. When scores were adjusted against an expected standard, underperforming trainees could be identified, and reliability much improved. Taken together with other evidence on trainee ability, the mini-CEX is of sufficient reliability for inclusion in high stakes decisions on trainee progression towards independent specialist practice.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:30:39 AEDT ]]>